Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • S student_project_template
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributor statistics
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
  • Issues 3
    • Issues 3
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 0
    • Merge requests 0
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Artifacts
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Container Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • tutorial
  • student_project_template
  • Wiki
  • final project report

final project report · Changes

Page history
rgly created page: final project report authored Feb 11, 2017 by Chia-Wei Chang's avatar Chia-Wei Chang
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
final-project-report.md
View page @ 1ebae945
...@@ -29,3 +29,7 @@ bool GF64::test() ...@@ -29,3 +29,7 @@ bool GF64::test()
return plus & mul & div; return plus & mul & div;
} }
``` ```
心得
=======================
這次的程式碼實作上比Viterbi簡單許多,因為除錯真的蠻容易的,只要多項式跟GF(64)的四則運算都實作完了,其實剩下的事情就不多了。再加上大家都是參考自老師的講義來實作,所以演算法都大同小異,要交互驗證計算過程中所產生的σ1(x), ω(x)是非常容易的事。比較讓我訝異的地方是,這個project並沒有要求學生去跑BER的數據。我認為不做點實驗去驗證理論是很奇怪的事,所以就重覆利用了前一次project所留下的程式碼來測這份code的能力。這樣就可以從圖表裡頭去交互驗證理論跟實務上到底有沒有吻合。
Clone repository
  • final project report
  • Home
  • lab1 preview report
  • lab2 preview report